People are always referring to refractive index having an effect on gemstone brightness. I’ve been cutting for years, been through the GIA gemologist program, and talked to a number of obviously smart gem cutters about this. Still, I’m confused. I don’t see why refractive index affects anything other than cutting angles, particularly those of the crown. I’ve messed around with GemCad’s ray-tracing program and test cut a number of stones. It seems to me that gemstone brightness is more a function of design (angles and shape), color depth, and polish quality than of a gem’s refractive index. I believe that a well cut and polished aquamarine is every bit as bright as a similarly shaped cubic zirconia, although the angles may differ. Could you highly analytical folks please straighten me out on this?
You raise a number of points to address. Imagine a simple cut with a flat crown and a single set of pavilion facets at an angle which causes total internal reflection for all normally entering light. This gemstone will return all the light that enters on axis back in the direction in which it came. That is, it will have a 100% reflectivity. A diamond cut this way will return the same amount of light as a piece of glass: virtually all of it.
The variation in brilliance arises because the light doesn’t all enter the stone on-axis. If you hold a stone above an easily-visible background, the background won’t be visible through the stone while you’re viewing on axis. If you tilt the stone, however, the background will become visible through some of the pavilion facets as the incidence angles change and total internal reflection fails. This is called windowing.
The fact is, if the refractive index of a gem is high, you have to tilt it a long way before windowing occurs. If you have a low RI material like quartz, a window will appear after only a few degrees of tilt. Thus, the higher RI material will reflect (and return) light from a much wider range of angles than the lower RI material. The higher RI gem will also tolerate a larger range of angles in the pavilion design without windowing. You can expect it to show a lively appearance over a wide range of orientations. The lower RI gem will become dull when tilted. Some gem cutting designs may highlight “tilt brightness,” but the quality of the results improves if you use high RI gems.
Another factor affecting gemstone brightness is surface reflectivity, which is governed by Fresnel equations and is dependent on the RI of the material. When light hits the outer surface of the material, the amount reflected back at this “first surface” depends on its RI. For quartz, it’s about 5%. For diamond, it’s about 20-30%. This also adds to the high apparent “sparkle” of the high RI stone.
I do agree with you that polish quality and facet flatness can be even more important to gemstone brightness in practice, since all this theory assumes perfectly flat surfaces. An interesting experiment is to take one of your better gemstones and one commercial or well-worn gem into a partly sunlit room on a sunny day. Place both stones in direct sunlight so that they reflect spots of light on to a surface (preferably in shade) a few feet away. The poorly polished stone will reflect dim smudges of light because the round facets have dispersed the light over a small angle. In contrast, the spots from the properly polished stone will be small and bright. This is a useful way of assessing your facet flatness.
Dr. Clive Washington