Fake News in the Gem Trade: A Waterworn Emerald from Chivor?
What Should Chivor Emeralds Look Like?
To experienced gemologists or geologists, the first clue this was a bogus story is obvious. The specimen in question has a rounded surface, thus indicating it came from a waterworn, alluvial deposit. However, the Chivor mine in Colombia is a hard rock deposit. This means emeralds extracted from it will have sharp, angular crystal faces rather than rounded surface features.
A Waterworn Emerald from Madagascar?
Over a decade ago, several exceptionally large, waterworn emerald crystals were reported from Madagascar. At the time, there was general uncertainty regarding their identity. Did they actually qualify as emeralds or were they more properly classified as just green beryls?
To my knowledge, the only gemological laboratory that identified them as emeralds was the International Gemological Institute (IGI) in Antwerp, Belgium. However, the IGI didn’t issue an opinion on origin.
Are These the Same Crystals?
Although it’s impossible to determine if the specimen in the 2007 IGI report is the same crystal as the one reported by JR Colombian Emeralds via Amazing Geologist, they do have some remarkable similarities. The two crystals have virtually identical hue, tone, and saturation. They also both have waterworn rounded surface features as well as distinct orangey yellow iron oxide staining.
I conclude that the claim by JR Colombian Emeralds via Amazing Geologist that the specimen was “recently extracted from the Chivor mine in Colombia” is, indeed, fake news.
Editor’s note: For a list of some of the largest known emeralds, see this article by Mr. Bergman.